The National Assembly is facing mounting criticism from civil society groups, political analysts, and concerned citizens over what many describe as a pattern of frequent recesses and a lack of transparency around lawmakers’ attendance records.
Observers argue that the legislature’s recurring breaks are excessive, especially at a time when the country is grappling with pressing economic, security, and social challenges that require urgent legislative attention. Critics say the extended recesses slow down lawmaking, delay critical reforms, and weaken oversight of the executive arm of government.
Adding to the controversy is the issue of attendance secrecy. Advocacy groups have raised concerns that the public has little to no access to detailed records showing how often lawmakers attend plenary sessions or committee meetings. This lack of openness, they argue, undermines accountability and makes it difficult for constituents to evaluate the performance of their elected representatives.
Transparency advocates insist that attendance records should be made publicly available in a clear and accessible format. According to them, such disclosure would not only promote accountability but also encourage lawmakers to be more diligent in carrying out their duties. “Citizens have a right to know whether those they elected are actually showing up to work,” one civic group representative said.
In response, some lawmakers have defended the recess schedule, noting that breaks are necessary for constituency engagement, oversight visits, and policy research. They also argue that legislative work extends beyond plenary sessions and often takes place behind the scenes in committees and consultations.
However, critics remain unconvinced, pointing out that without transparent attendance data, such claims are difficult to verify. They are calling for reforms that would standardize legislative calendars, limit the frequency of recesses, and mandate the publication of attendance records.
As public pressure continues to grow, the controversy has sparked a broader conversation about legislative accountability, productivity, and the need for institutional reforms within the National Assembly. Many believe that restoring public trust will require not only policy changes but also a renewed commitment by lawmakers to openness and responsibility.