South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has filed a legal challenge against a parliamentary report that could pave the way for impeachment proceedings over the so‑called “Farmgate” scandal.
Background of the South African President’s Legal Challenge
- In 2022, an independent panel found evidence Ramaphosa may have committed serious misconduct after $580,000 was allegedly stolen from his Phala Phala farm, hidden in a sofa.
- The panel said he may have violated his oath of office and had “a case to answer.”
- Ramaphosa denied wrongdoing, insisting the money came from the sale of buffaloes.
Constitutional Court Ruling
Earlier this month, the Constitutional Court ruled that Parliament acted unconstitutionally in 2022 when it voted against establishing an impeachment inquiry. At the time, Ramaphosa’s ANC held a majority. Since losing that majority in the 2024 general election, the ANC now governs in a coalition.
Ramaphosa’s Legal Challenge
Filed Tuesday at the High Court in Cape Town, Ramaphosa argued the panel had:
- “Misconceived its mandate”
- “Misjudged the information placed before it”
- “Misinterpreted the four charges advanced against me”
He added: “I do not make this application lightly,” urging the court to set aside the report and annul the impeachment process.
Next Steps
- Parliament’s Speaker has already formed a 31‑member impeachment committee, including MPs from 16 parties.
- The committee will decide whether grounds exist to proceed with impeachment.
- Impeachment requires support from two‑thirds of the 400‑member Parliament.
Outlook
The case underscores the fragility of Ramaphosa’s position in a coalition era and the enduring shadow of Farmgate. With strict rules on foreign currency and mounting political pressure, the president’s legal battle could shape South Africa’s political trajectory in the months ahead.